Watercolor girls
I am messing around with watercolors again, to get my hand looser and more spontaneous on my large scale paintings, plus there has been awfully few girls in my work recently, so here’s the catch up; and here’s another one.
6×8 in, 2010, listed on Etsy
Inspired by Sartorialist. This is about the first time I drew from a reference photo that I did not take myself or have not been asked to use by the photographer. I recently did some work that had to involve some partial use of borrowed material and then around the same time I saw a show about Picasso and how he boldly used old master paintings as reference. The legal rule of thumb I’ve heard is if art created off someone else’s creative property, it’s got to be altered enough to be it’s own thing. To me it’s also about how close the used image is to what I am trying to express, so the photos I took, and, therefore are my personal expressions, translate into more successful and complete painting. What thoughts do you have on this point?

February 20th, 2010 at 7:26 pm
I like the cropping on this one. Yes, for me the photos I take are all embryonic paintings. They are the beginning of something, but like you imply, they often are not the end of something. If I start my painting using one of my own reference photos I like to just put the photo away at a certain point and simply work from what’s in my head and my memory. It’s a lovely, liberating feeling.
February 21st, 2010 at 11:04 am
I also like the composition – it’s “cool”! I often work from photos, my own and from other people and know that “liberating feeling” that Sheila mentions. Only wish it happened more often – I find it difficult sometimes to let go.
February 22nd, 2010 at 8:25 am
Thank you guys for your thoughts on this, yep the feeling bit is paramount. Here is a post that I dug up in the afterthought that clarifies the issue further: http://jmcolberg.com/weblog/2010/02/where_does_fair_use_begin_or_end.html